Beta · Being built now
Entitlement
What your family is owed by statute. Not what someone thinks you might get: what the written rule actually says.
Entitlement is the knowable part
Government benefits are the one corner of this whole problem where a definite answer exists. Somebody wrote a rule. The rule has an income limit, an age floor, a residency requirement, a service record. It was published, and it has a date.
That makes entitlement fundamentally different from the rest of senior support. A community program might have a waitlist that changes weekly. A statute does not. If we read the rule correctly and you answered honestly, the answer is knowable in advance, and the only reason families do not know it is that nobody has ever sat down and checked.
What this is not. It is not an eligibility determination. The agency that runs the program makes that call, every time, and it can ask for things we never see. What we do is tell you which doors are worth walking through and which are not, and show you the rule we used.
Why ruling something out is a feature
Most tools in this category only ever add to your list. Longer lists feel generous and they are actually a way of avoiding responsibility, because every item is somebody else's phone call to make.
A family that spends forty hours applying for a program they were never eligible for has been failed. They had no time to begin with, and the tool took some anyway. So entitlement returns a negative state, plainly, with the rule attached:
Ruled out. Aid and Attendance is added to a VA pension, so it requires a veteran or the surviving spouse of a veteran. You told us there is no military service in the family.
You can read that, disagree with it, and tell us we have it wrong. That is the point. A verdict with no rule behind it is not something you can argue with.
The two errors are not the same size
A wrong yes costs a wasted application and some disappointment. Annoying, recoverable. A wrong no costs someone money they were owed, possibly for years, and they never find out, because people who are told no stop looking.
So the bar is deliberately lopsided. We rule out only on a bright line that you have told us about yourself: a hard limit, the wrong state, an age floor, a status you have said you do not have. Never on a hunch, a pattern, or a summary somebody wrote about a rule.
And when we do not know, we say we do not know. Unknown is a third answer. It is never quietly rendered as a no, because that is exactly how the expensive error happens.
What is live today
The check already runs entitlement rules against five verified programs, and it already returns ruled-out states with the rule shown. What is still being built is the depth: every state, every county, and the ongoing verification that keeps a rule from going stale without anyone noticing.
Last reviewed 28 July 2026
The check already does this for California.
Five programs, verified, with the rule shown on every answer.